<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Assessment Information Request &#8211; An Open Letter To Joe Thomas And The Board</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deerridgeowners.com/2009/09/28/assessment-information-request-an-open-letter-to-joe-thomas-and-the-board/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deerridgeowners.com/2009/09/28/assessment-information-request-an-open-letter-to-joe-thomas-and-the-board/</link>
	<description>Giving A Voice To Owners</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 03:50:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil C-208</title>
		<link>http://deerridgeowners.com/2009/09/28/assessment-information-request-an-open-letter-to-joe-thomas-and-the-board/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil C-208</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deerridgeowners.com/?p=298#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Hey Tom,   Board,
 
 In reponse to you  e-mail below,     I have always been straightforward and independant in my questions and actions,   In the past, When I was not with RML,   I made my reasons very clear, My problem with RML at the time was 50/50  or was it  55/45 ?   split not being the market  split,  I was puzzled as to why everyone seemed to be O.K with the Pooling of income and expense...   when that changed,  I eagerly went with RML  and am still with RML.
 
  My effort to rent our unit individually was met with outright accusations of  me  &quot; Trying Steal money from RML  and GG&amp;RC &quot;   and that accusation was published on a website....  &quot;I have that quote filed away&quot;   I never unerstood why the board approved Joe spending the money to send out the letter he did,  then billing ME for it...  Then  crediting the money back to me after we paid it to  RML...   As if I had no right to show someone how our unit was decorated differently than the cookie cutter style that All RML units were required to maintain at that time,  and they may save money renting directly from an owner,   Just An example of the mindset at the time,  all that changed...  Let&#039;s not get that way again  and be entrenched in Being unified  to the point of doing things like that that just  did not make sense...  Like telling Joe not to allow copies to be made...
 
  My questions below in no way say that I think there is a conspiracy,  and challege anyone to find anything to that effect that I personally have  ever written.
 
  I do wonder why  the board thinks the paperwork asked for by Robert and others is somehow protected from being copied,  since we are ALL owners of the records of both  RML &amp;  GGRC  and if we are owners,  why would the board not want copies made available to all owners without them having to drive hundreds of miles in most cases to see and study them if they so desire,   Now you may feel that statement is somehow conspiratory,   It Is Not,  it is simply an observation and a question..   As far as the board wanting to have consesus that is fine,  but each of you have an opinion,  I have heard that in the 4-5 meetings I have attended,  &quot; Why I would like Digital Recordings&quot;  
 
   I am asking each of  you for your opinion,  that is not to say the Board did not come to a mutual agreement as it should,  but me asking for your own views on 2 subjects is not too much to ask...   
 
I don&#039;t know what a judge may say on these matters,  

I can live with it either way,   But the board not wanting owners to have their own documents to study,   is not something we as owners should have to pay good money to defend...
 
  Again my feelings are known to the board, and to Joe,   Just because some of us feel the running of RML  is costing the Owners money, creating all this discord among owners.
 
  The free market will take care of the situation, the demographics  are changing fast.
 
Please just let Robert make the copies without us all wasting time and money going to court.
 
Thanks for Reading with an open mind.
 
 
Neil     C-208</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tom,   Board,</p>
<p> In reponse to you  e-mail below,     I have always been straightforward and independant in my questions and actions,   In the past, When I was not with RML,   I made my reasons very clear, My problem with RML at the time was 50/50  or was it  55/45 ?   split not being the market  split,  I was puzzled as to why everyone seemed to be O.K with the Pooling of income and expense&#8230;   when that changed,  I eagerly went with RML  and am still with RML.</p>
<p>  My effort to rent our unit individually was met with outright accusations of  me  &#8221; Trying Steal money from RML  and GG&amp;RC &#8221;   and that accusation was published on a website&#8230;.  &#8220;I have that quote filed away&#8221;   I never unerstood why the board approved Joe spending the money to send out the letter he did,  then billing ME for it&#8230;  Then  crediting the money back to me after we paid it to  RML&#8230;   As if I had no right to show someone how our unit was decorated differently than the cookie cutter style that All RML units were required to maintain at that time,  and they may save money renting directly from an owner,   Just An example of the mindset at the time,  all that changed&#8230;  Let&#8217;s not get that way again  and be entrenched in Being unified  to the point of doing things like that that just  did not make sense&#8230;  Like telling Joe not to allow copies to be made&#8230;</p>
<p>  My questions below in no way say that I think there is a conspiracy,  and challege anyone to find anything to that effect that I personally have  ever written.</p>
<p>  I do wonder why  the board thinks the paperwork asked for by Robert and others is somehow protected from being copied,  since we are ALL owners of the records of both  RML &amp;  GGRC  and if we are owners,  why would the board not want copies made available to all owners without them having to drive hundreds of miles in most cases to see and study them if they so desire,   Now you may feel that statement is somehow conspiratory,   It Is Not,  it is simply an observation and a question..   As far as the board wanting to have consesus that is fine,  but each of you have an opinion,  I have heard that in the 4-5 meetings I have attended,  &#8221; Why I would like Digital Recordings&#8221;  </p>
<p>   I am asking each of  you for your opinion,  that is not to say the Board did not come to a mutual agreement as it should,  but me asking for your own views on 2 subjects is not too much to ask&#8230;   </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what a judge may say on these matters,  </p>
<p>I can live with it either way,   But the board not wanting owners to have their own documents to study,   is not something we as owners should have to pay good money to defend&#8230;</p>
<p>  Again my feelings are known to the board, and to Joe,   Just because some of us feel the running of RML  is costing the Owners money, creating all this discord among owners.</p>
<p>  The free market will take care of the situation, the demographics  are changing fast.</p>
<p>Please just let Robert make the copies without us all wasting time and money going to court.</p>
<p>Thanks for Reading with an open mind.</p>
<p>Neil     C-208</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil C-208</title>
		<link>http://deerridgeowners.com/2009/09/28/assessment-information-request-an-open-letter-to-joe-thomas-and-the-board/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil C-208</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deerridgeowners.com/?p=298#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 08:23:01 -0500
From: tomtrip@verizon.net
To: openroad12@hotmail.com
CC: davidbarone@optonline.net; mickmargie@zoomtown.com; larryo@skdocpa.com; parker.luther@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Copies of the Records ?

Neil,

The reason you have not, and will not, hear from each individual Board member is that we are a united Board that works closely together to present a consensus which we believe is in the best interest of a majority of the owners at Deer Ridge.  There is no subterfuge in this policy and we have nothing to hide.  Please stop with the conspiracy theories!

Tom Reise
Board Vice President

On Sep 30, 2009, NEIL BLAIR  wrote:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 08:23:01 -0500<br />
From: <a href="mailto:tomtrip@verizon.net">tomtrip@verizon.net</a><br />
To: <a href="mailto:openroad12@hotmail.com">openroad12@hotmail.com</a><br />
CC: <a href="mailto:davidbarone@optonline.net">davidbarone@optonline.net</a>; <a href="mailto:mickmargie@zoomtown.com">mickmargie@zoomtown.com</a>; <a href="mailto:larryo@skdocpa.com">larryo@skdocpa.com</a>; <a href="mailto:parker.luther@gmail.com">parker.luther@gmail.com</a><br />
Subject: Re: Copies of the Records ?</p>
<p>Neil,</p>
<p>The reason you have not, and will not, hear from each individual Board member is that we are a united Board that works closely together to present a consensus which we believe is in the best interest of a majority of the owners at Deer Ridge.  There is no subterfuge in this policy and we have nothing to hide.  Please stop with the conspiracy theories!</p>
<p>Tom Reise<br />
Board Vice President</p>
<p>On Sep 30, 2009, NEIL BLAIR  wrote:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil C-208</title>
		<link>http://deerridgeowners.com/2009/09/28/assessment-information-request-an-open-letter-to-joe-thomas-and-the-board/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil C-208</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 04:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deerridgeowners.com/?p=298#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Hey  Luther,  Board,
 
What is the reason you all don&#039;t want to release copies of the records for GGRC  and  RML  ?
 
It would seem to me that if there is no downside to it,  It really can&#039;t matter that much.
 
Please answer this in a simple, direct,  timely  and complete way,   I would appreciate an answer or some type of explaination from each board member.  
 
  With my other questions regarding the Digital Recording,   I  have gotten one or two word responses like &quot;E-Mail Received &quot; from both  Tom  and Margie,  no response at all from  David,  and Larry,    Margie even askes God to Bless me....  He has blessed all of us,  I know I have been blessed,  but honest concerned conversational answers  are what is in order here.
 
David,   How do you feel on the questions asked by Robert,  Myself,  Others  ?
 
Margie,  How do you feel on the same ?
 
Larry,    How do you feel.... ?
 
Tom,     Same  ?
 
Luther,  Same  ?
 
It really puzzles me why this is happening.
 
I promise you I&#039;m not trying to be a smarty pants or trouble maker,  neither is Robert,  just searching  for answers to legitimate questions we and others have.
 
Please don&#039;t Dis-regard us,  or give us short unmeaningful answers or none at all.
 
Neil     C-208</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey  Luther,  Board,</p>
<p>What is the reason you all don&#8217;t want to release copies of the records for GGRC  and  RML  ?</p>
<p>It would seem to me that if there is no downside to it,  It really can&#8217;t matter that much.</p>
<p>Please answer this in a simple, direct,  timely  and complete way,   I would appreciate an answer or some type of explaination from each board member.  </p>
<p>  With my other questions regarding the Digital Recording,   I  have gotten one or two word responses like &#8220;E-Mail Received &#8221; from both  Tom  and Margie,  no response at all from  David,  and Larry,    Margie even askes God to Bless me&#8230;.  He has blessed all of us,  I know I have been blessed,  but honest concerned conversational answers  are what is in order here.</p>
<p>David,   How do you feel on the questions asked by Robert,  Myself,  Others  ?</p>
<p>Margie,  How do you feel on the same ?</p>
<p>Larry,    How do you feel&#8230;. ?</p>
<p>Tom,     Same  ?</p>
<p>Luther,  Same  ?</p>
<p>It really puzzles me why this is happening.</p>
<p>I promise you I&#8217;m not trying to be a smarty pants or trouble maker,  neither is Robert,  just searching  for answers to legitimate questions we and others have.</p>
<p>Please don&#8217;t Dis-regard us,  or give us short unmeaningful answers or none at all.</p>
<p>Neil     C-208</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  deerridgeowners.com/2009/09/28/assessment-information-request-an-open-letter-to-joe-thomas-and-the-board/feed/ ) in 0.74795 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 6:02 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 7:02 pm UTC -->
